Improvement of cognitive function in wild-type and Alzheimer´s disease mouse models by the immunomodulatory properties of menthol inhalation or by depletion of T regulatory cells

A complex network of interactions exists between the olfactory, immune and central nervous systems. In this work we intend to investigate this connection through the use of an immunostimulatory odorant like menthol, analyzing its impact on the immune system and the cognitive capacity in healthy and Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models.

 

We first found that repeated short exposures to menthol odor enhanced the immune response against ovalbumin immunization. Menthol inhalation also improved the cognitive capacity of immunocompetent mice but not in immunodeficient NSG mice, which exhibited very poor fear-conditioning. This improvement was associated with a downregulation of IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA in the brain´s prefrontal cortex, and it was impaired by anosmia induction with methimazole. Exposure to menthol for 6 months (1 week per month) prevented the cognitive impairment observed in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer. Besides, this improvement was also observed by the depletion or inhibition of T regulatory cells. Treg depletion also improved the cognitive capacity of the APP^{NL-G-F/NL-G-F} Alzheimer´s mouse model. In all cases, the improvement in learning capacity was associated with a downregulation of IL-1β mRNA. Blockade of the IL-1 receptor with anakinra resulted in a significant increase in cognitive capacity in healthy mice as well as in the APP/PS1 model of Alzheimer´s disease. These data suggest an association between the immunomodulatory capacity of smells and their impact on the cognitive functions of the animals, highlighting the potential of odors and immune modulators as therapeutic agents for CNS-related diseases.

 

1 Introduction

There is evidence of the existence of a complex connection between the olfactory system, the central nervous system (CNS) and our cognitive behavior. In fact, various groups showed associations between the loss of olfactory function and CNS-related diseases including depression, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s (AD) or Parkinson’s diseases. In some of these pathologies, olfactory dysfunctions precede the disease symptoms and are considered as a predictive factor (1–4).

Perception of smells may influence the physiological activity of the brain thus modulating brain functions including memory and/or emotions. The stimulation of olfactory receptors by the activation of guanine nucleotide binding proteins (GPCR), initiates synaptic signals that are transmitted to the brain by the olfactory bulb. Interestingly, this olfactory pathway presents direct connections to brain regions involved in memory and emotion such as the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus or amygdala, among others (reviewed in (5)). However, it is unknown if there is any other facilitator or intermediary element in this complex relationship between the olfactory system and the CNS. Apart from these more direct relationships between the olfactory system and the brain, the olfactory pathway may also affect the immune system, which is also somehow connected with the CNS. It was described that olfactory bulbectomy, commonly used as an animal model of depression (6), results in important immune changes (7). It remains unclear how the immune function underlies part of the brain abnormalities observed when the olfactory pathway is disrupted or which are the immune mediators involved. The truth is that there is increasing evidence indicating that the immune system plays a role in learning and memory, neural plasticity, brain functioning and behavioral processes (8–14).

In a previous study carried out in mice, we observed that certain odorants behaved as immunostimulatory or immunosuppressor agents. Interestingly, we found that carvone, an odor classified as immunosuppressive in C57BL/6J mice, also reduced their memory capacity (15). Exposure to menthol improved the immune response to antigen immunization. In this work we have confirmed the immunostimulatory properties of menthol and also discovered its beneficial effect on mice’s cognitive capacity. This surprising result encouraged us to study in more detail the possible interaction between the olfactory system, the immune system and the CNS.

We found that loss of olfactory capacity drastically reduced the immune response to immunization with a foreign antigen and worsened the memory capacity of mice. Because of their activity to modulate the immune system, we also studied the effect of the elimination of regulatory T cells (Treg) on mice’s cognitive capacity. Interestingly, we observed that repeated exposure to menthol or the inhibition or depletion of Treg reduced IL-1β mRNA levels in the brain and alleviated the age-related cognitive deterioration in AD mouse models. These improvements were also achieved by the administration of the IL-1 receptor inhibitor anakinra, pointing to this cytokine as a key player in the connection between the olfactory system, the immune system and the cognitive function. Despite the lack of a clear explanatory mechanism, our results constitute new evidence for the existence of a complex interaction among olfactory, immune and neurologic systems that may open new therapeutic opportunities for CNS-related diseases.

 

2 Materials and methods

 

2.1 Odorant stimulation system

Menthol (Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI.) was dissolved in distilled water (1:1000 w/v). A closed system prototype was designed to allow the vaporization of fragrance compounds (15). Inhalation of menthol was scheduled for different time periods (from 1 week to months depending on the experiments), with 8 cycles of 15 minutes of inhalation per day (1 cycle of exposure every 3 hours) as previously described (15). Schematics depicting the experimental procedures were created in Biorender.com.

 

2.2 Antigen presentation experiments

CD11c⁺ dendritic cells (DC) and CD8 T cells were obtained from the spleens of C57/BL6 and OT1 mice respectively, using magnetic separation columns according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany). The purified CD11c⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells were used for antigen presentation experiments. Briefly, CD11c⁺ cells were incubated 2 hours at 37°C with 10 μg/ml of SIINFEKL peptide (Preprotech (UK). After washing, purified OTI CD8⁺ cells were added to the culture at a ratio 1:4 (CD11c: CD8). The co-culture was maintained for 24 hours to evaluate T cell proliferation (by [methyl-3H] thymidine incorporation) and IFNγ secretion (by ELISPOT) as previously described (15).

 

2.3 Mice and in vivo experiments

Six to eight-week-old BALB/c or C57BL/6 female mice (Envigo, Barcelona, Spain) were used to evaluate the impact of fragrance inhalation.

Male and female APP/PS1 mice were used to test the effect of menthol inhalation on memory. APP/PS1 (a recognized mouse model for AD (16, 17)) were bred and housed in the animal facility of the University of Navarra.

Male and female homozygous APP^NL-G-F mice (a new generation of AD mouse model (18)) were used to test the effect of Treg depletion in memory. The APP knock-in mouse (APP^{NL-G-F/NL-G-F}) carries the humanized APP including three mutations associated with familial AD: the Swedish “NL”, the Iberian “F”, and the Arctic “G” mutation. The levels of pathogenic Aβ in this mouse model are elevated due to the combined effects of these three mutations that promote Aβ toxicity by increasing total Aβ production (Swedish mutation), rising the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (Iberian mutation), and promoting Aβ aggregation (Arctic mutation). These mutations lead to Aβ deposition and age-associated cognitive impairment (18). These APP^NL-G-F mice were provided by RIKEN Brain Science Institute (Japan). A colony was maintained and housed in the animal facility of the University of Navarra.

Male and female Foxp3-DTR-GFP transgenic mice (B6.129(Cg)-Foxp3tm3(DTR/GFP)Ayr/J) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. DTR-eGFP expression is observed in fully functional Foxp3⁺CD4+ T cell populations allowing fluorescent detection of Foxp3⁺ Treg cells. This model allows for specific transient elimination of Foxp3⁺ Treg by treatment with diphtheria toxin. OTI transgenic mice (C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/Crl) expressing a transgenic T cell receptor designed to recognize the H2K^b-restricted cytotoxic T cell epitope from ovalbumin (residues 257-264) were purchased by Charles River. NSG mice were kindly provided by Dr. Melero (CIMA). All the experiments using male and female mice were balanced to avoid possible effects of sex. All these animals were inbred and housed in the animal facility of the University of Navarra.

All experiments were performed according to international animal care guidelines and with the approval of our local Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation (Protocols 060c-19, 046-20, 087c-19, 097-20) and following the European Directive 2010/63/EU.

 

2.3.1 Ovalbumin immunization experiments

C57BL/6 received an intravenous injection of chicken ovalbumin (OVA) protein (1 nmol/mouse) plus poly I:C (50 μg/mouse) and were exposed to vaporized menthol or water vapor as control for 7 days as previously described (15). Some groups were also treated with methimazole 75 mg/kg (i.p.) 6 hours before vaccination. Seven days after immunization, T cell proliferation (measured by methyl-3H-thymidine incorporation) and the measurement of IFN-γ producing T cells (carried out by ELISPOT using a kit from BD-Pharmingen (San Diego, CA) was conducted as previously described (15).

 

2.4 Contextual fear conditioning

Contextual fear conditioning test, a quick and reliable method to assess memory in rodents (19), was used to evaluate the mouse cognitive function as previously described (20). Briefly, the test takes 3 days. On day 1 (habituation), mice were placed in the training chamber for 3 min. Twenty-four hours later, day 2 (training phase), mice were placed in the training chamber for 2 min. Subsequently, mice received a footshock (0.3 mA 2 s) and returned to their home cage. Long-term memory was evaluated during the test phase at day 3 after training. Lack of movement was defined as freezing. Freezing scores were expressed as percentages. The procedure was carried out in a StartFear system (Panlab S.L., Barcelona, Spain). The analogical signal is transmitted to the FREEZING and STARTLE software. In T cell depletion experiments, C57BL/6 mice were treated intraperitoneally with 300μg/mouse of anti-CD25 antibody (BioXcell) four days before the fear conditioning test. Treg depletion was confirmed by flow cytometry. Specific depletion of Treg was induced in Foxp3-DTR mice by a single i.p. injection of 1 μg/mouse of diphtheria toxin 4 days prior behavioral studies. Depletion of Treg was confirmed by flow cytometry. Treg inhibition experiments were conducted by i.p injection of the FOXP3 inhibitor peptide CM1315 (produced by Wuxi App tech (China)) as previously described (21).

2.5 mRNA extraction and measurement of gene expression by iqPCR

Animals were perfused with PBS and prefrontal cortex and choroid plexus were dissected and frozen. RNA was purified and after the reverse transcription, cDNA amplification was performed on an Applied Biosystems CFX96 RT System using sense and antisense specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) as previously described (15). Relative expression of target genes was determined using the formula 2^ΔCt, where ΔCt indicates the difference in the threshold cycle between the housekeeping gene (Cyclophilin A) and target genes.

2.6 Determination of Aβ levels

Brain Aβ₄₂ levels (soluble and insoluble) were measured by using a sensitive sandwich ELISA kit (Invitrogen). Tissue (prefrontal cortex) was homogenized in a buffer containing 5 M guanidine HCl and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, protease inhibitors (Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Roche, Barcelona, Spain) and phosphatase inhibitors (0.1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF) and the assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7 Statistical analysis

Normality was assessed with Shapiro-Wilk W test. Statistical analyses were performed using parametric (Student´s t test and one-way ANOVA) and non-parametric (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis) tests. For all tests a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Descriptive data for continuous variables are reported as means±SEM. GraphPad Prism for Windows was used for statistical analysis.

3 Results

3.1 Effect of the immunomodulatory properties of menthol in the cognitive capacity of mice

To confirm the immunostimulatory properties of exposure to menthol (15), C57BL/6 mice (6 weeks old) were immunized with OVA mixed with poly I:C. Then, mice were housed in vaporization cages and exposed to cycles of 15 min of menthol or water vapor (air control) every 3 h during 7 days (8 cycles per day, 15 min/cycle, n=12-15 mice per group). Ten days after immunization, mice were evaluated in their cognitive capacity by using the fear conditioning test (Figure 1A). After this analysis, mice were sacrificed to evaluate the immune response against the OVA cytotoxic T cell epitope SIINFEKL measuring the number of IFN-γ-producing cells by ELISPOT (Figure 1B). Mice exposed to menthol had significantly higher numbers of IFN-γ producing cells specific for SIINFEKL peptide. Notably, mice exposed to menthol exhibited significantly more freezing than control mice, suggesting an improvement in their cognitive capacity (Figure 1C). Interestingly, mRNA expression levels in the prefrontal cortex indicated a significant reduction of CD3 as well as IL-6 and IL-1β in mice exposed to menthol compared to control mice (Figure 1D), two cytokines that have been associated with cognitive decline in humans (9, 22, 23).

 

3.2 Effect of methimazole-induced anosmia on memory capacity in mice

In an attempt to go deeper into this complex interaction, we studied the effect of anosmia on the immunomodulatory/cognitive effects of menthol (Figure 2A). It was reported that methimazole (MTZ) administration produces extensive degenerative changes in olfactory epithelium and a severe deficit in odor detection in rats or mice (24–26). We treated the mice with MTZ or with saline (n=20-24 mice per group) and ten days later, the olfactory epithelium was isolated and analyzed by H&E staining. As previously described, cilia atrophy (black arrows) and epithelial thickening (white arrows) in the olfactory epithelium was observed (Figure 2B). When a fear conditioning test was carried out in mice 10 days after a single injection of MTZ, a reduction in the percentage of freezing values was observed in anosmic mice, suggesting impairment in their cognitive capacity (Figure 2C). This impairment in memory capacity was associated with an increase in CD3, IL-6 and IL-1β mRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex of the mice (measured in a subgroup of 6-8 randomly selected mice, Figure 2D).

We then studied the potential impact of MTZ on the immune system by measuring its effects in mice after immunization with OVA (n=12-15 mice per group, Figure 2E). Although this immunization induced high numbers of IFN-γ producing cells specific for the cytotoxic T cell epitope SIINFEKL, this effect was dramatically impaired when mice were treated with a single dose of MTZ after immunization with OVA. Moreover, exposure to menthol odor in MTZ treated mice did not restore the immunogenicity of OVA previously observed (Figure 2F). Importantly, immune inhibition induced by MTZ treatment was accompanied by an impaired cognitive capacity, which was not recovered by exposure to menthol (Figure 2G). Freezing values in control mice in the experiments plotted in Figures 2C, G are different. This is probably due to the differences in the protocol and the environment to which the animals were subjected in both settings (27, 28). Despite these differences in both control groups, it can be concluded in both experiments that MTZ treatment negatively affects cognitive ability measured in the fear conditioning experiment. These data may suggest that anosmia causes immunosuppression, and has a deleterious effect on memory capacity.

To discard potential unspecific immunosuppressive effects of MTZ, we tested its effect on T cells and DCs in vitro and in vivo. Splenocytes isolated from naïve mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 antibodies in the presence/absence of 50, 10 or 1 μM of MTZ and T cell proliferation was measured. No significant changes in proliferation were observed upon MTZ treatment, suggesting that MTZ does not have a direct detrimental effect on T cells (Supplementary Figure 1A). We then treated naïve mice with 75 mg/kg of MTZ or saline and, one week later, splenocytes were stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 antibodies to measure T cell proliferation. No significant differences were observed in the proliferative capacity of T cells (Supplementary Figure 1B). Similarly, we could not detect any inhibitory effect of MTZ on DC in vitro or in vivo. DCs isolated from naïve C57BL/6 mice and treated in vitro with 100 or 500 μM of MTZ and then pulsed with SIINFEKL peptide, stimulated OT1 T cell proliferation and IFN-γ production similarly to untreated control DC (Supplementary Figure 1C). Likewise, DCs purified from MTZ-treated mice and then pulsed with SIINFEKL peptide showed the same antigen presentation capacity as DC from untreated mice (Supplementary Figure 1D). DCs purified from MTZ or saline-treated mice responded similarly to LPS stimulation (not shown). These data indicate that MTZ has no direct impact on immune cells.

 

3.3 Effect of the immune system on memory capacity in mice.

Once the link between the olfactory and the immune system was established, we aimed to study the effect of the immune system on memory capacity. First, we evaluated the fear memory of the highly immunodeficient NSG mice (NOD scid gamma mouse strain, with a mixed background between BALB/c and C57BL/6) lacking T cells, B cells and natural killer cells. BALB/c and C57BL/6 showed a similar % of freezing in the fear conditioning test (Supplementary Figure 2A). While BALB/c mice had normal freezing values that were improved by menthol exposure, NSG mice had a dramatic memory impairment that was not affected by menthol vaporization (n=10-15 mice per group, Figure 3A). These data suggest that immune cells, either those absent (T, B or NK cells) or those defective (monocytes or macrophages) in NSG mice could have a role in learning function. Indeed, there is accumulating evidences on the implication of cytokines produced by immune cells in the behavioral response to stimuli, cognition and learning but also in the context of neurodegenerative diseases (reviewed in (13)). To evaluate the role of immune T cell activation, we carried out in vivo experiments of depletion or inhibition of T regulatory cells, a key specific T cell subpopulation maintaining immune tolerance by controlling the activation of T cells (29). In fact, it was suggested that the depletion of Treg cells might mitigate the neuroinflammatory response in murine models of AD and reverse the cognitive decline observed in these animals (30). Thus, C57BL/6 mice were treated with anti-CD25 antibodies four days before the fear conditioning experiment (n=16 mice per group). Interestingly, Treg depletion significantly improved mice’s cognitive capacity (Figure 3B). Similar results were found when using Foxp3DTR knock-in mice treated with diphtheria toxin to deplete Foxp3⁺ Treg cells (n=25 mice per group, Figure 3C) or when mice were treated with the Treg inhibitory peptide CM1315 (31) (n=20 mice per group, 100 μgr/mouse per day, Figure 3D). Diphtheria toxin administration in C57BL/6 wt mice does not affect cognitive capacity (Supplementary Figure 2B). Baruch et al. showed that transient Treg depletion affects the brain’s choroid plexus, a selective gateway for immune cell trafficking to the CNS (30). Thus, we studied the levels of expression of CD3, IL-6, and IL-1β mRNA expression in the choroid plexus (measured in a subgroup of 4-6 randomly selected mice). Interestingly, we found that CD25 cell depletion resulted in higher CD3 mRNA levels, suggesting an increase in T cell infiltration into the brain. Moreover, we found a reduction in IL-1β and an increase in IL-6 mRNA levels (Figure 3F). Similar results were found in mice treated with the Treg inhibitory peptide CM1315 (Figure 3G). These data suggest that IL-1β can have a detrimental effect on a fear-motivated learning task, results in agreement with previous observations in different murine models (32). Notably, we observed that intraperitoneal administration of the IL-1β inhibitor anakinra for 6 consecutive days (50 mg/kg per day) significantly improved the freezing time in our system (n=10 mice per group, Figure 3E), suggesting a beneficial role of IL-1β blockade in learning capacity.

 

3.4 Effect of Treg depletion on the cognitive function in APP^NL-G-F mouse model of AD

Prompted by the positive effects of Treg depletion in memory tasks, we tested the effect of Treg depletion in the behavior of 5-month-old APP^NL-G-F mice, already described to suffer an age-dependent memory impairment (33) (Supplementary Figure 2C). APP^NL-G-F mice were treated with saline or with anti-CD25 antibodies at months 3, 4 and 5 (one administration of 300 μg/mouse per month, n= 9-10 mice per group). Treg depletion was analyzed in the peripheral blood 6 days after each antibody administration. One week after the last anti-CD25 treatment at month 5, mice were evaluated in the freezing conditioning paradigm (Figure 4A). Interestingly, it was found that mice treated with the anti-CD25 antibody had a significantly higher percentage of freezing, suggesting an improvement in their cognitive capacity (Figure 4B). This improvement was associated with a significant increase in CD3 and a significant decrease of IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA in the prefrontal cortex (Figure 4C). This decrease of IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA was also observed in the choroid plexus (Supplementary Figure 3). We then explored the effect of anti-CD25 on Aβ pathology in APP^NL-G-F mice. Total Aβ42 levels (soluble and insoluble) in the prefrontal cortex of these animals were determined by a sandwich ELISA. As shown in Supplementary Figure 4A, no differences were observed in Aβ42 levels in APP^NL-G-F mice treated with anti-CD25 compared with vehicle-treated mice.

 

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation, Universidad de Navarra.

Author contributions

This study was designed, directed and coordinated by JL, NC, AG-O and MC-T. MC-T and AG-O, provided conceptual and technical guidance for neurological aspects of the study and were implicated in the interpretation of data. MA, AL-C, ME, IV, FN, PC-C, JF-I, ES, JL and NC provided conceptual and technical guidance and were implicated in the interpretation of data. MA and NC conducted most of the experiments of this study. The manuscript was initially written by JL and reviewed and edited by all authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2021-128283OA-I00 financed by MCIN/ AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and by FEDER A way of making Europe and PID2019-104921RB-I00), Department of Economic and Business Development from the Government of Navarra (INNOLFACT project; Ref. 0011-1411-2020-000028) and Explora grant from Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, (SAF2013-50067-EXP to JL).

Acknowledgments

We thank Elena Ciordia and Eneko Elizalde for excellent animal care and Andoni Fourco for helping in the design of the vaporization system. The authors would like to thank Dr. Diego Alignani for his help from the Cytometry Facility at CIMA.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130044/full#supplementary-material

 

 

References

1. Kjelvik G, Saltvedt I, White LR, Stenumgard P, Sletvold O, Engedal K, et al. The brain structural and cognitive basis of odor identification deficits in mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer’s disease. BMC Neurol(2014) 14:168. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0168-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kotecha AM, Correa ADC, Fisher KM, Rushworth JV. Olfactory dysfunction as a global biomarker for sniffing out alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Biosensors (Basel)(2018) 8(2):41. doi: 10.3390/bios8020041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wang J, Eslinger PJ, Doty RL, Zimmerman EK, Grunfeld R, Sun X, et al. Olfactory deficit detected by fmri in early alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res(2010) 1357:184–94. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Conti MZ, Vicini-Chilovi B, Riva M, Zanetti M, Liberini P, Padovani A, et al. Odor identification deficit predicts clinical conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia due to alzheimer’s disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol(2013) 28(5):391–9. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sowndhararajan K, Kim S. Influence of fragrances on human psychophysiological activity: with special reference to human electroencephalographic response. Sci Pharm(2016) 84(4):724–51. doi: 10.3390/scipharm84040724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Song C, Leonard BE. The olfactory bulbectomised rat as a model of depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev(2005) 29(4-5):627–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kelly JP, Wrynn AS, Leonard BE. The olfactory bulbectomized rat as a model of depression: an update. Pharmacol Ther(1997) 74(3):299–316. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(97)00004-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Avital A, Goshen I, Kamsler A, Segal M, Iverfeldt K, Richter-Levin G, et al. Impaired interleukin-1 signaling is associated with deficits in hippocampal memory processes and neural plasticity. Hippocampus(2003) 13(7):826–34. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bourgognon JM, Cavanagh J. The role of cytokines in modulating learning and memory and brain plasticity. Brain Neurosci Adv(2020) 4:2398212820979802. doi: 10.1177/2398212820979802

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hryniewicz A, Bialuk I, Kaminski KA, Winnicka MM. Impairment of recognition memory in interleukin-6 knock-out mice. Eur J Pharmacol(2007) 577(1-3):219–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.08.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Morimoto K, Nakajima K. Role of the immune system in the development of the central nervous system. Front Neurosci(2019) 13:916. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Naude PJ, Dobos N, van der Meer D, Mulder C, Pawironadi KG, den Boer JA, et al. Analysis of cognition, motor performance and anxiety in young and aged tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor 1 and 2 deficient mice. Behav Brain Res(2014) 258:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Salvador AF, de Lima KA, Kipnis J. Neuromodulation by the immune system: a focus on cytokines. Nat Rev Immunol(2021) 21(8):526–41. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00508-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yirmiya R, Goshen I. Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis. Brain Behav Immun(2011) 25(2):181–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lasarte-Cia A, Lozano T, Perez-Gonzalez M, Gorraiz M, Iribarren K, Hervas-Stubbs S, et al. Immunomodulatory properties of carvone inhalation and its effects on contextual fear memory in mice. Front Immunol(2018) 9:68. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Borchelt DR, Thinakaran G, Eckman CB, Lee MK, Davenport F, Ratovitsky T, et al. Familial alzheimer’s disease-linked presenilin 1 variants elevate Abeta1-42/1-40 ratio in vitroand in vivo. Neuron(1996) 17(5):1005–13. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80230-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Radde R, Bolmont T, Kaeser SA, Coomaraswamy J, Lindau D, Stoltze L, et al. Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology. EMBO Rep(2006) 7(9):940–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Saito T, Matsuba Y, Mihira N, Takano J, Nilsson P, Itohara S, et al. Single app knock-in mouse models of alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci(2014) 17(5):661–3. doi: 10.1038/nn.3697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wehner JM, Radcliffe RA. Cued and contextual fear conditioning in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci(2004) Chapter 8: Unit 8 5C, 1–14. doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0805cs27

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ricobaraza A, Cuadrado-Tejedor M, Marco S, Perez-Otano I, Garcia-Osta A. Phenylbutyrate rescues dendritic spine loss associated with memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Hippocampus(2012) 22(5):1040–50. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Lozano T, Gorraiz M, Lasarte-Cia A, Ruiz M, Rabal O, Oyarzabal J, et al. Blockage of Foxp3 transcription factor dimerization and Foxp3/Aml1 interaction inhibits T regulatory cell activity: sequence optimization of a peptide inhibitor. Oncotarget(2017) 8(42):71709–24. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17845

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Elderkin-Thompson V, Irwin MR, Hellemann G, Kumar A. Interleukin-6 and memory functions of encoding and recall in healthy and depressed elderly adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry(2012) 20(9):753–63. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31825d08d6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lyra ESNM, Goncalves RA, Pascoal TA, Lima-Filho RAS, Resende EPF, Vieira ELM, et al. Pro-inflammatory interleukin-6 signaling links cognitive impairments and peripheral metabolic alterations in alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry(2021) 11(1):251. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01349-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Bergman U, Brittebo EB. Methimazole toxicity in rodents: covalent binding in the olfactory mucosa and detection of glial fibrillary acidic protein in the olfactory bulb. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol(1999) 155(2):190–200. doi: 10.1006/taap.1998.8590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Genter MB, Deamer NJ, Blake BL, Wesley DS, Levi PE. Olfactory toxicity of methimazole: dose-response and structure-activity studies and characterization of flavin-containing monooxygenase activity in the long-Evans rat olfactory mucosa. Toxicol Pathol(1995) 23(4):477–86. doi: 10.1177/019262339502300404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Genter MB, Owens DM, Carlone HB, Crofton KM. Characterization of olfactory deficits in the rat following administration of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (Dichlobenil), 3,3′-iminodipropionitrile, or methimazole. Fundam Appl Toxicol(1996) 29(1):71–7. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.0007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science(1999) 284(5420):1670–2. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5420.1670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wotjak CT. Sound check, stage design and screen plot – how to increase the comparability of fear conditioning and fear extinction experiments. Psychopharmacol (Berl)(2019) 236(1):33–48. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5111-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell(2008) 133(5):775–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Baruch K, Rosenzweig N, Kertser A, Deczkowska A, Sharif AM, Spinrad A, et al. Breaking immune tolerance by targeting Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells mitigates alzheimer’s disease pathology. Nat Commun(2015) 6:7967. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Casares N, Rudilla F, Arribillaga L, Llopiz D, Riezu-Boj JI, Lozano T, et al. A peptide inhibitor of Foxp3 impairs regulatory T cell activity and improves vaccine efficacy in mice. J Immunol(2010) 185(9):5150–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Depino AM, Alonso M, Ferrari C, del Rey A, Anthony D, Besedovsky H, et al. Learning modulation by endogenous hippocampal il-1: blockade of endogenous il-1 facilitates memory formation. Hippocampus(2004) 14(4):526–35. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mehla J, Lacoursiere SG, Lapointe V, McNaughton BL, Sutherland RJ, McDonald RJ, et al. Age-dependent behavioral and biochemical characterization of single app knock-in mouse (App(Nl-G-F/Nl-G-F)) model of alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging(2019) 75:25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Marin I, Kipnis J. Learning and memory and the immune system. Learn Mem(2013) 20(10):601–6. doi: 10.1101/lm.028357.112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Perry VH, Cunningham C, Holmes C. Systemic infections and inflammation affect chronic neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Immunol(2007) 7(2):161–7. doi: 10.1038/nri2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Brynskikh A, Warren T, Zhu J, Kipnis J. Adaptive immunity affects learning behavior in mice. Brain Behav Immun(2008) 22(6):861–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cohen H, Ziv Y, Cardon M, Kaplan Z, Matar MA, Gidron Y, et al. Maladaptation to mental stress mitigated by the adaptive immune system Via depletion of naturally occurring regulatory Cd4+Cd25+ cells. J Neurobiol(2006) 66(6):552–63. doi: 10.1002/neu.20249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. De Luca C, Colangelo AM, Alberghina L, Papa M. Neuro-immune hemostasis: homeostasis and diseases in the central nervous system. Front Cell Neurosci(2018) 12:459. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. DiSabato DJ, Quan N, Godbout JP. Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. J Neurochem(2016) 139(Suppl 2):136–53. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13607

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kipnis J, Cohen H, Cardon M, Ziv Y, Schwartz M. T Cell deficiency leads to cognitive dysfunction: implications for therapeutic vaccination for schizophrenia and other psychiatric conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A.(2004) 101(21):8180–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402268101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Levin SG, Pershina EV, Bugaev-Makarovskiy NA, Chernomorets IY, Konakov MV, Arkhipov VI. Why do levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines increase during memory acquisition? Neuroscience(2021) 473:159–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ziv Y, Ron N, Butovsky O, Landa G, Sudai E, Greenberg N, et al. Immune cells contribute to the maintenance of neurogenesis and spatial learning abilities in adulthood. Nat Neurosci(2006) 9(2):268–75. doi: 10.1038/nn1629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bryche B, Baly C, Meunier N. Modulation of olfactory signal detection in the olfactory epithelium: focus on the internal and external environment, and the emerging role of the immune system. Cell Tissue Res(2021) 384(3):589–605. doi: 10.1007/s00441-021-03467-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Hosoi J, Tanida M, Tsuchiya T. Mitigation of stress-induced suppression of contact hypersensitivity by odorant inhalation. Br J Dermatol(2001) 145(5):716–9 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04409.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Joussain P, Rouby C, Bensafi M. A pleasant familiar odor influences perceived stress and peripheral nervous system activity during normal aging. Front Psychol(2014) 5:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Matsunaga M, Bai Y, Yamakawa K, Toyama A, Kashiwagi M, Fukuda K, et al. Brain-immune interaction accompanying odor-evoked autobiographic memory. PloS One(2013) 8(8):e72523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Strous RD, Shoenfeld Y. To smell the immune system: olfaction, autoimmunity and brain involvement. Autoimmun Rev(2006) 6(1):54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Tizard I, Skow L. The olfactory system: the remote-sensing arm of the immune system. Anim Health Res Rev(2021) 22(1):14–25. doi: 10.1017/S1466252320000262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Zalcman S, Kerr L, Anisman H. Immunosuppression elicited by stressors and stressor-related odors. Brain Behav Immun(1991) 5(3):262–73.0889-1591(91)90022-3 doi: 10.1016/0889-1591(91)90022-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Huang ZB, Sheng GQ. Interleukin-1beta with learning and memory. Neurosci Bull(2010) 26(6):455–68. doi: 10.1007/s12264-010-6023-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Griffin WS, Liu L, Li Y, Mrak RE, Barger SW. Interleukin-1 mediates Alzheimer and lewy body pathologies. J Neuroinflamm(2006) 3:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-3-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Griffin WS, Stanley LC, Ling C, White L, MacLeod V, Perrot LJ, et al. Brain interleukin 1 and s-100 immunoreactivity are elevated in down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A.(1989) 86(19):7611–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Rothwell NJ, Luheshi GN. Interleukin 1 in the brain: biology, pathology and therapeutic target. Trends Neurosci(2000) 23(12):618–25. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01661-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Forlenza OV, Diniz BS, Talib LL, Mendonca VA, Ojopi EB, Gattaz WF, et al. Increased serum il-1beta level in alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cognit Disord(2009) 28(6):507–12. doi: 10.1159/000255051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Marsland AL, Petersen KL, Sathanoori R, Muldoon MF, Neumann SA, Ryan C, et al. Interleukin-6 covaries inversely with cognitive performance among middle-aged community volunteers. Psychosom Med(2006) 68(6):895–903. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000238451.22174.92

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Weaver JD, Huang MH, Albert M, Harris T, Rowe JW, Seeman TE. Interleukin-6 and risk of cognitive decline: macarthur studies of successful aging. Neurology(2002) 59(3):371–8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.3.371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Luis JP, Simoes CJV, Brito RMM. The therapeutic prospects of targeting il-1r1 for the modulation of neuroinflammation in central nervous system disorders. Int J Mol Sci(2022) 23(3):1731–66. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Nemeth DP, Quan N. Modulation of neural networks by interleukin-1. Brain Plast(2021) 7(1):17–32. doi: 10.3233/BPL-200109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Jang Y, Woo KA, Lee ST, Park SH, Chu K, Lee SK. Cerebral autoinflammatory disease treated with anakinra. Ann Clin Transl Neurol(2018) 5(11):1428–33. doi: 10.1002/acn3.656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Kitazawa M, Cheng D, Tsukamoto MR, Koike MA, Wes PD, Vasilevko V, et al. Blocking il-1 signaling rescues cognition, attenuates tau pathology, and restores neuronal beta-catenin pathway function in an alzheimer’s disease model. J Immunol(2011) 187(12):6539–49. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Filiano AJ, Xu Y, Tustison NJ, Marsh RL, Baker W, Smirnov I, et al. Unexpected role of interferon-gamma in regulating neuronal connectivity and social behaviour. Nature(2016) 535(7612):425–9. doi: 10.1038/nature18626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Browne TC, McQuillan K, McManus RM, O’Reilly JA, Mills KH, Lynch MA. Ifn-gamma production by amyloid beta-specific Th1 cells promotes microglial activation and increases plaque burden in a mouse model of alzheimer’s disease. J Immunol(2013) 190(5):2241–51. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Litteljohn D, Nelson E, Hayley S. Ifn-gamma differentially modulates memory-related processes under basal and chronic stressor conditions. Front Cell Neurosci(2014) 8:391. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Monteiro S, Ferreira FM, Pinto V, Roque S, Morais M, de Sa-Calcada D, et al. Absence of ifngamma promotes hippocampal plasticity and enhances cognitive performance. Transl Psychiatry(2016) 6(1):e707. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Belkhelfa M, Rafa H, Medjeber O, Arroul-Lammali A, Behairi N, Abada-Bendib M, et al. Ifn-gamma and tnf-alpha are involved during Alzheimer disease progression and correlate with nitric oxide production: a study in Algerian patients. J Interferon Cytokine Res(2014) 34(11):839–47. doi: 10.1089/jir.2013.0085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Duffy SS, Keating BA, Perera CJ, Moalem-Taylor G. The role of regulatory T cells in nervous system pathologies. J Neurosci Res(2018) 96(6):951–68. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, Bradt B, Bauer J, Cole GM, et al. Inflammation and alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging(2000) 21(3):383–421. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00124-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Baek H, Ye M, Kang GH, Lee C, Lee G, Choi DB, et al. Neuroprotective effects of Cd4+Cd25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a 3xtg-ad alzheimer’s disease model. Oncotarget(2016) 7(43):69347–57. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Alves S, Churlaud G, Audrain M, Michaelsen-Preusse K, Fol R, Souchet B, et al. Interleukin-2 improves amyloid pathology, synaptic failure and memory in alzheimer’s disease mice. Brain(2017) 140(3):826–42. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Dansokho C, Ait Ahmed D, Aid S, Toly-Ndour C, Chaigneau T, Calle V, et al. Regulatory T cells delay disease progression in Alzheimer-like pathology. Brain(2016) 139(Pt 4):1237–51. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Rosenkranz D, Weyer S, Tolosa E, Gaenslen A, Berg D, Leyhe T, et al. Higher frequency of regulatory T cells in the elderly and increased suppressive activity in neurodegeneration. J Neuroimmunol(2007) 188(1-2):117–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.05.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Yang Y, He Z, Xing Z, Zuo Z, Yuan L, Wu Y, et al. Influenza vaccination in early alzheimer’s disease rescues amyloidosis and ameliorates cognitive deficits in App/Ps1 mice by inhibiting regulatory T cells. J Neuroinflamm(2020) 17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01741-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Cuadrado-Tejedor M, Hervias I, Ricobaraza A, Puerta E, Perez-Roldan JM, Garcia-Barroso C, et al. Sildenafil restores cognitive function without affecting beta-amyloid burden in a mouse model of alzheimer’s disease. Br J Pharmacol(2011) 164(8):2029–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01517.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Dodart JC, Bales KR, Gannon KS, Greene SJ, DeMattos RB, Mathis C, et al. Immunization reverses memory deficits without reducing brain abeta burden in alzheimer’s disease model. Nat Neurosci(2002) 5(5):452–7. doi: 10.1038/nn842

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Gong B, Vitolo OV, Trinchese F, Liu S, Shelanski M, Arancio O. Persistent improvement in synaptic and cognitive functions in an Alzheimer mouse model after rolipram treatment. J Clin Invest(2004) 114(11):1624–34. doi: 10.1172/JCI22831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Perez-Gonzalez M, Mendioroz M, Badesso S, Sucunza D, Roldan M, Espelosin M, et al. Pla2g4e, a candidate gene for resilience in Alzheimer s disease and a new target for dementia treatment. Prog Neurobiol(2020) 191:101818. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Ewbank DC, Arnold SE. Cool with plaques and tangles. N Engl J Med(2009) 360(22):2357–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0901965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Qi F, Zuo Z, Yang J, Hu S, Yang Y, Yuan Q, et al. Combined effect of bcg vaccination and enriched environment promote neurogenesis and spatial cognition Viaa shift in meningeal macrophage M2 polarization. J Neuroinflamm(2017) 14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0808-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Rosenzweig N, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Tsitsou-Kampeli A, Keren-Shaul H, Ben-Yehuda H, Weill-Raynal P, et al. Pd-1/Pd-L1 checkpoint blockade harnesses monocyte-derived macrophages to combat cognitive impairment in a tauopathy mouse model. Nat Commun(2019) 10(1):465. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08352-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Schwartz M, Baruch K. Vaccine for the mind: immunity against self at the choroid plexus for erasing biochemical consequences of stressful episodes. Hum Vaccin Immunother(2012) 8(10):1465–8. doi: 10.4161/hv.21649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Zambom-Ferraresi F, Zambom-Ferraresi F, Fernandez-Irigoyen J, Lachen-Montes M, Cartas-Cejudo P, Lasarte JJ, et al. Olfactory characterization and training in older adults: protocol study. Front Aging Neurosci(2021) 13:757081. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.757081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Al Ain S, Poupon D, Hetu S, Mercier N, Steffener J, Frasnelli J. Smell training improves olfactory function and alters brain structure. Neuroimage(2019) 189:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Kollndorfer K, Fischmeister FP, Kowalczyk K, Hoche E, Mueller CA, Trattnig S, et al. Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss. NeuroImage Clin(2015) 9:401–10. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Rezaeyan A, Asadi S, Kamrava SK, Khoei S, Zare-Sadeghi A. Reorganizing brain structure through olfactory training in post-traumatic smell impairment: an mri study. J Neuroradiol(2022) 49(4):333–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2021.04.035

 

Date: 27 April 2023

Authors: Noelia Casares, María Alfaro1†, Mar Cuadrado-Tejedor, Aritz Lasarte-Cia1, Flor Navarro, Isabel Vivas, María Espelosin, Paz Cartas-Cejudo, Joaquín Fernández-Irigoyen, Enrique Santamaría, Ana García-Osta and Juan José Lasarte.

1 Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain

2 Gene Therapy for Neurological Disease Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain

3 Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

4 Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain

5 Clinical Neuroproteomics Unit, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain

 

Link: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130044/full#f4

 

Nutrigenomics Institute is not responsible for the comments and opinions included in this article